A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are topic to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, particularly within a delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, where views of The ocean are each really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waist-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of arranging files, maps, and situations hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is motivated by concern for environmental safety and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they may have described their lengthy-standing link to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair only looking to develop a family house in accordance with the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea through a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times post about René Collier famous that the businessman had Formerly been involved in community advocacy on preparing and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waist-substantial h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should Are living together with each other long once the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties including environmental defense and home legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will in the end René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.